top of page

Latest news

River Mole September water quality status : Poor! 🤕

  • Oct 5
  • 3 min read

We're changing our water quality reporting format to include a shorter snapshot report each month with a more detailed quarterly seasonal analysis. Here is the snapshot of September's news and data.

AquaWatch team with River Mole River Watch installing "wakas"
AquaWatch team with River Mole River Watch installing "wakas"

To begin, we've collaborated with the amazing team at AquaWatch to install live pollution monitors on a trial basis. The data from the four strategically placed sensors along the middle-mole will be intriguing to report. I should mention that this fantastic initiative will complement, but not replace, our citizen science efforts! Sincere thanks to the AquaWatch team for making this exciting venture possible.


September Water Quality Report

September started off wet but became progressively drier.

ree

The prolonged dry weather from Mid-September caused river pollution concentration to rise. River flow during our citizen science test weekend 27-28 September was 1.1m3/s at Leatherhead and 0.8m3/s at Dorking. River levels were below normal for the time of year.

As a result of low flow, our tests showed unusually elevated levels of pollution concentration.

ree

Phosphate

At 1.02ppm, average catchment phosphate concentration was the highest since July 2024.

The rise in phosphate concentration in September further highlights the absence of a pronounced "summer peak" in 2025 compared to peaks in 2023 and especially 2024.

ree

Across the catchment a number of tributaries continued to show dangerously elevated concentrations of phosphate including Hookwood Common Brook and Leigh Brook in Bad WQ (water quality) status. Several other tributaries were very poor WQ status including Spencers Gill, Burstow Lake Lane, Redhill Brook, Salfords Stream and Betchworth Brook.

ree

The entire main channel of the River Mole from Horley downstream to the Thames tested Poor water quality, in many places well over 1ppm. The average for the main River Mole channel was 1.33ppm, a level previously only seen in summer months.

ree

Nitrate

September average catchment Nitrate concentration was the third highest recorded since beginning our testing in April 2024.
ree

The tributaries hosting sewage treatment works showed much higher nitrate concentration than those without.

ree

The main River Mole channel downstream of Horley and through the Mole Gap into the Lower Mole also showed worryingly high nitrate levels.

ree

Tributaries without sewage treatment works show consistently low levels of nitrate.

ree

The impact of sewage treatment works on nitrate levels is very pronounced, as shown by these chart below.

ree


Ammonia

Average ammonia concentration for the catchment has remained slightly elevated since Spring but this hides extreme levels found in a few streams.
ree

While most streams have low ammonia levels a few streams record very high concentration most notably Hookwood Common Brook which also has very high phosphate levels.

ree

The handful of streams with very high ammonia concentration stand out in the map below i.e. Hookwood Common Brook, Wallace Brook, Redhill Brook and Spencers Gill.

ree

Of the badly behaving streams Hookwood Common Brook is by far the most concerning with levels of phosphate "off-scale" and ammonia levels indicating acute sewage pollution. This is despite an EA permit for the package sewage treatment plant in question. We continue to raise this with the EA.

ree

Overall, our catchment continues to fall into Poor water quality status with 80% of streams in the class of Moderate-Poor-Bad. This remains unacceptable and our mission is to work with stakeholders and the public to reduce pollution in our beautiful river.


We recently surveyed Redhill Brook with the EA and SERT. I'll report back on this soon once we've analysed results.

As always an enormous thank you to our incredible team of citizen science volunteers who are building the most comprehensive water quality data for any catchment in the UK.



 
 
 

1 Comment


Unknown member
Oct 05

Thank you team. Funny how Thames water have money for TV advertising saying they are upgrading the 150 year old pipessewage with plastic water pipes which I believe is only guaranteed for 25 years 🤔

Many thanks again for all you doing again

Like

To receive periodic emails with our latest news subscribe to our mailing list.​

If you would like to become a member, in addition to the receiving the latest news, members have voting rights and are invited to our AGM; if you are interested in volunteering please fill in the 'Become a member' form below and tick the 'volunteer' box. Membership is free.​

ONLY FILL IN ONE OF THE FORMS - Thank you!​​​

Subscribe to our mailing list

Become a member
Wordpress Transparent.png

Thank you for joining us! A confirmation and welcome email has been sent to you.

​​River Mole River Watch is run by volunteers. We rely on funding from donations and grants. ​ Each of our volunteer citizen scientists need a full test kit which cost £300, plus £25 every year for reagents.  We also need funds to cover the running costs of the charity, which we try to keep to a minimum but there are essentials - insurance, website hosting, printing and hiring rooms to run events. Any donations will be very gratefully received and will enable us to continue the work we are doing on the River Mole.

 

River Mole River Watch is free to join, any donation that you can make would help enormously. ​​​​ Thank you!​​

Donate now with Local Giving 

Thank you very much!

River Mole River Watch - charity number 1212153  

​​

Site designed by Caroline Cardew-Smith

Our thanks to Colin Kemp for the wildlife photos 

bottom of page